1965 Austin A 60 vs. 2008 Chrysler Town & Country
To start off, 2008 Chrysler Town & Country is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 3,298 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Chrysler Town & Country is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Chrysler Town & Country weights approximately 695 kg more than 1965 Austin A 60.
Because 1965 Austin A 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Austin A 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Chrysler Town & Country, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Austin A 60 | 2008 Chrysler Town & Country | |
Make | Austin | Chrysler |
Model | A 60 | Town & Country |
Year Released | 1965 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1621 cc | 3298 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1815 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 5150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3080 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 76 L |