1965 Austin A 60 vs. 2008 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2008 Mazda Tribute is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 2,299 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Mazda Tribute is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda Tribute (153 HP) has 93 more horse power than 1965 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 1965 Austin A 60.
Because 1965 Austin A 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Austin A 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda Tribute, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda Tribute (201 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Austin A 60. (122 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2008 Mazda Tribute will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Austin A 60 | 2008 Mazda Tribute | |
Make | Austin | Mazda |
Model | A 60 | Tribute |
Year Released | 1965 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1621 cc | 2299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 122 Nm | 201 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 9.7:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 2070 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 55 L |