1965 Austin A 60 vs. 2008 Mitsubishi Outlander
To start off, 2008 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Mitsubishi Outlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mitsubishi Outlander (138 HP) has 78 more horse power than 1965 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mitsubishi Outlander should accelerate faster than 1965 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mitsubishi Outlander weights approximately 610 kg more than 1965 Austin A 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2008 Mitsubishi Outlander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Austin A 60. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mitsubishi Outlander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mitsubishi Outlander (310 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 188 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Austin A 60. (122 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2008 Mitsubishi Outlander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Austin A 60 | 2008 Mitsubishi Outlander | |
| Make | Austin | Mitsubishi |
| Model | A 60 | Outlander |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1621 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 138 HP |
| Torque | 122 Nm | 310 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 1750 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 18.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1730 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4650 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1690 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2680 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 60 L |
