1965 Austin A 60 vs. 2012 Peugeot 5008
To start off, 2012 Peugeot 5008 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 1,621 cc (4 cylinders), 1965 Austin A 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Peugeot 5008 (154 HP) has 94 more horse power than 1965 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Peugeot 5008 should accelerate faster than 1965 Austin A 60.
Because 1965 Austin A 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Austin A 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Peugeot 5008, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Peugeot 5008 (240 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 118 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Austin A 60. (122 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2012 Peugeot 5008 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Austin A 60 | 2012 Peugeot 5008 | |
| Make | Austin | Peugeot |
| Model | A 60 | 5008 |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1621 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 154 HP |
| Torque | 122 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 1400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1835 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1640 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2735 mm |
