1965 Austin A 60 vs. 2013 Lincoln MKZ
To start off, 2013 Lincoln MKZ is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Lincoln MKZ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Lincoln MKZ (237 HP) has 177 more horse power than 1965 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Lincoln MKZ should accelerate faster than 1965 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Lincoln MKZ weights approximately 500 kg more than 1965 Austin A 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Austin A 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Austin A 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Lincoln MKZ, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Lincoln MKZ (366 Nm @ 3300 RPM) has 244 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Austin A 60. (122 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2013 Lincoln MKZ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Austin A 60 | 2013 Lincoln MKZ | |
| Make | Austin | Lincoln |
| Model | A 60 | MKZ |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1621 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 237 HP |
| Torque | 122 Nm | 366 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3300 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 87 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 83 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 9.3:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1620 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4930 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 2116 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1478 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2850 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 63 L |
