1965 Austin A 90 vs. 1963 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1965 Austin A 90 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 1965 Austin A 90. (120 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1965 Austin A 90. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 520 kg more than 1965 Austin A 90. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Austin A 90 | 1963 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Austin | Cadillac |
Model | A 90 | 62 |
Year Released | 1965 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2910 cc | 6390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83.4 mm | 101.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 98.4 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 2090 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 5680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 3300 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 79 L |