1965 Austin A 90 vs. 1972 Suzuki LJ 20
To start off, 1972 Suzuki LJ 20 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin A 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin A 90 would be higher. At 2,910 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Austin A 90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Austin A 90 (120 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 1972 Suzuki LJ 20. (27 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Austin A 90 should accelerate faster than 1972 Suzuki LJ 20.
Because 1972 Suzuki LJ 20 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Austin A 90. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1972 Suzuki LJ 20 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1965 Austin A 90 (221 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 184 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Suzuki LJ 20. (37 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 1965 Austin A 90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Suzuki LJ 20.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Austin A 90 | 1972 Suzuki LJ 20 | |
Make | Austin | Suzuki |
Model | A 90 | LJ 20 |
Year Released | 1965 | 1972 |
Engine Size | 2910 cc | 359 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 27 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 37 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |