1965 Austin A 90 vs. 1984 Autobianchi A 112
To start off, 1984 Autobianchi A 112 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin A 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin A 90 would be higher. At 2,910 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Austin A 90 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Austin A 90 weights approximately 910 kg more than 1984 Autobianchi A 112.
Because 1965 Austin A 90 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Austin A 90. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Autobianchi A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Austin A 90 | 1984 Autobianchi A 112 | |
Make | Austin | Autobianchi |
Model | A 90 | A 112 |
Year Released | 1965 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2910 cc | 963 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 660 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 3280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2050 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 30 L |