1965 Austin A 90 vs. 2002 Mahindra Bolero
To start off, 2002 Mahindra Bolero is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin A 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin A 90 would be higher. At 2,910 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Austin A 90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Austin A 90 (120 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 2002 Mahindra Bolero. (72 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Austin A 90 should accelerate faster than 2002 Mahindra Bolero. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mahindra Bolero weights approximately 125 kg more than 1965 Austin A 90.
Because 2002 Mahindra Bolero is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Austin A 90. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mahindra Bolero will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1965 Austin A 90 (221 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Mahindra Bolero. (155 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1965 Austin A 90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Mahindra Bolero.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Austin A 90 | 2002 Mahindra Bolero | |
| Make | Austin | Mahindra |
| Model | A 90 | Bolero |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2002 |
| Engine Size | 2910 cc | 2497 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 120 HP | 72 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 221 Nm | 155 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 1695 kg |
