1965 Austin A 90 vs. 2007 Nissan 1400

To start off, 2007 Nissan 1400 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin A 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin A 90 would be higher. At 2,910 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Austin A 90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Austin A 90 (120 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 2007 Nissan 1400. (63 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Austin A 90 should accelerate faster than 2007 Nissan 1400.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1965 Austin A 90 (221 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 124 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Nissan 1400. (97 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1965 Austin A 90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Nissan 1400.

Compare all specifications:

1965 Austin A 90 2007 Nissan 1400
Make Austin Nissan
Model A 90 1400
Year Released 1965 2007
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2910 cc 1397 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 120 HP 63 HP
Engine RPM 4750 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 221 Nm 97 Nm
Torque RPM 2750 RPM 2500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 83.4 mm 76 mm
Engine Stroke Size 88.9 mm 77 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 8.3:1 9.4:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 3 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Length 4780 mm 3850 mm
Vehicle Width 1750 mm 1430 mm
Vehicle Height 1540 mm 1500 mm
Wheelbase Size 2750 mm 2310 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 34 L 45 L