1965 Austin A 90 vs. 2011 Jeep Compass

To start off, 2011 Jeep Compass is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin A 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin A 90 would be higher. At 2,910 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Austin A 90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Jeep Compass (158 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1965 Austin A 90. (120 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Jeep Compass should accelerate faster than 1965 Austin A 90.

Because 1965 Austin A 90 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Austin A 90. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Jeep Compass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1965 Austin A 90 (221 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Jeep Compass. (191 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 1965 Austin A 90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Jeep Compass.

Compare all specifications:

1965 Austin A 90 2011 Jeep Compass
Make Austin Jeep
Model A 90 Compass
Year Released 1965 2011
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2910 cc 2000 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 120 HP 158 HP
Engine RPM 4750 RPM 6400 RPM
Torque 221 Nm 191 Nm
Torque RPM 2750 RPM 5000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 4780 mm 4404 mm
Vehicle Width 1750 mm 1760 mm
Vehicle Height 1540 mm 1656 mm
Wheelbase Size 2750 mm 2634 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 34 L 51 L