1965 Austin A 90 vs. 2013 Nissan Cube

To start off, 2013 Nissan Cube is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin A 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin A 90 would be higher. At 2,910 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Austin A 90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 120 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Austin A 90 weights approximately 298 kg more than 2013 Nissan Cube.

Because 1965 Austin A 90 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Austin A 90. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Nissan Cube, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1965 Austin A 90 (221 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Nissan Cube. (172 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 1965 Austin A 90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Nissan Cube.

Compare all specifications:

1965 Austin A 90 2013 Nissan Cube
Make Austin Nissan
Model A 90 Cube
Year Released 1965 2013
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2910 cc 1800 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 120 HP 120 HP
Engine RPM 4750 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 221 Nm 172 Nm
Torque RPM 2750 RPM 4800 RPM
Engine Bore Size 83.4 mm 84 mm
Engine Stroke Size 88.9 mm 81 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual 6-speed manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1570 kg 1272 kg
Vehicle Length 4780 mm 3980 mm
Vehicle Width 1750 mm 1695 mm
Vehicle Height 1540 mm 1650 mm
Wheelbase Size 2750 mm 2530 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 34 L 50 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]