1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III vs. 1943 Cadillac 61
To start off, 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1943 Cadillac 61. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1943 Cadillac 61 would be higher. At 5,276 cc (8 cylinders), 1943 Cadillac 61 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III (146 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1943 Cadillac 61. (123 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III should accelerate faster than 1943 Cadillac 61. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1943 Cadillac 61 weights approximately 720 kg more than 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III | 1943 Cadillac 61 | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Cadillac |
| Model | 3000 Mk III | 61 |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1943 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2912 cc | 5276 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 146 HP | 123 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1900 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 3280 mm |
