1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III vs. 1949 Land Rover I
To start off, 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Land Rover I. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Land Rover I would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III (146 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 1949 Land Rover I. (51 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III should accelerate faster than 1949 Land Rover I.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III | 1949 Land Rover I | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Land Rover |
| Model | 3000 Mk III | I |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1949 |
| Engine Size | 2912 cc | 1595 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 146 HP | 51 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
