1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III vs. 1960 Ford Falcon
To start off, 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Ford Falcon would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III weights approximately 60 kg more than 1960 Ford Falcon.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III | 1960 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Ford |
Model | 3000 Mk III | Falcon |
Year Released | 1965 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 146 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1120 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2710 mm |