1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III vs. 1962 Renault 4
To start off, 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Renault 4 would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III weights approximately 634 kg more than 1962 Renault 4.
Because 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 Renault 4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III | 1962 Renault 4 | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Renault |
Model | 3000 Mk III | 4 |
Year Released | 1965 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 603 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 146 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 546 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 34 L |