1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III vs. 1963 Renault 8

To start off, 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Renault 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Renault 8 would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III (146 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 1963 Renault 8. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III should accelerate faster than 1963 Renault 8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III weights approximately 440 kg more than 1963 Renault 8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III 1963 Renault 8
Make Austin-Healey Renault
Model 3000 Mk III 8
Year Released 1965 1963
Engine Position Front Rear
Engine Size 2912 cc 956 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 146 HP 47 HP
Engine RPM 5250 RPM 5200 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Weight 1180 kg 740 kg
Vehicle Length 4010 mm 4000 mm
Vehicle Width 1540 mm 1500 mm
Vehicle Height 1250 mm 1560 mm
Wheelbase Size 2340 mm 2280 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 54 L 38 L