1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III vs. 1964 Volvo 220
To start off, 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Volvo 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Volvo 220 would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III (146 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 1964 Volvo 220. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III should accelerate faster than 1964 Volvo 220. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III weights approximately 165 kg more than 1964 Volvo 220. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III (166 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Volvo 220. (144 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Volvo 220.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III | 1964 Volvo 220 | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Volvo |
Model | 3000 Mk III | 220 |
Year Released | 1965 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 1776 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 146 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 166 Nm | 144 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1015 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 45 L |