1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III vs. 1986 Cadillac Brougham
To start off, 1986 Cadillac Brougham is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III would be higher. At 5,030 cc (8 cylinders), 1986 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 770 kg more than 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III | 1986 Cadillac Brougham | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Cadillac |
| Model | 3000 Mk III | Brougham |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2912 cc | 5030 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 146 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1950 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 5630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1950 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 3090 mm |
