1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III vs. 1991 Volvo 960

To start off, 1991 Volvo 960 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Volvo 960 (187 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. (146 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1991 Volvo 960 should accelerate faster than 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Volvo 960 weights approximately 350 kg more than 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III 1991 Volvo 960
Make Austin-Healey Volvo
Model 3000 Mk III 960
Year Released 1965 1991
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2912 cc 1986 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 146 HP 187 HP
Engine RPM 5250 RPM 5300 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1180 kg 1530 kg
Vehicle Length 4010 mm 4880 mm
Vehicle Width 1540 mm 1750 mm
Vehicle Height 1250 mm 1420 mm
Wheelbase Size 2340 mm 2780 mm