1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III vs. 1995 SsangYong Chairman H

To start off, 1995 SsangYong Chairman H is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 SsangYong Chairman H is equipped with a bigger engine.

Because 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 SsangYong Chairman H, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 SsangYong Chairman H (312 Nm) has 146 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. (166 Nm). This means 1995 SsangYong Chairman H will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. 1995 SsangYong Chairman H has automatic transmission and 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III has manual transmission. 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1995 SsangYong Chairman H will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: