1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III vs. 1996 Mazda MS-6
To start off, 1996 Mazda MS-6 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III weights approximately 40 kg more than 1996 Mazda MS-6.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III | 1996 Mazda MS-6 | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Mazda |
| Model | 3000 Mk III | MS-6 |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2912 cc | 1800 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 146 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1140 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4600 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1700 mm |
