1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III vs. 2004 Saleen S7
To start off, 2004 Saleen S7 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III would be higher. At 7,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Saleen S7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Saleen S7 (550 HP) has 404 more horse power than 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. (146 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Saleen S7 should accelerate faster than 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Saleen S7 weights approximately 67 kg more than 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III | 2004 Saleen S7 | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Saleen |
| Model | 3000 Mk III | S7 |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2912 cc | 7000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 146 HP | 550 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Top Speed | 195 km/hour | 322 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1247 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4755 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1981 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1041 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2692 mm |
