1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III vs. 2008 Holden UTE
To start off, 2008 Holden UTE is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Holden UTE (261 HP) has 115 more horse power than 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. (146 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Holden UTE (340 Nm) has 174 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. (166 Nm). This means 2008 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III | 2008 Holden UTE | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Holden |
Model | 3000 Mk III | UTE |
Year Released | 1965 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 146 HP | 261 HP |
Torque | 166 Nm | 340 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |