1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III vs. 2010 Peugeot 207
To start off, 2010 Peugeot 207 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Peugeot 207 (152 HP) has 6 more horse power than 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. (146 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Peugeot 207 should accelerate faster than 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III.
Because 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Peugeot 207, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III | 2010 Peugeot 207 | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Peugeot |
| Model | 3000 Mk III | 207 |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2912 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 146 HP | 152 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4044 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1972 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1397 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 50 L |
