1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III vs. 2012 Audi A6
To start off, 2012 Audi A6 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi A6 (201 HP) has 55 more horse power than 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. (146 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III.
Because 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III | 2012 Audi A6 | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Audi |
| Model | 3000 Mk III | A6 |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2912 cc | 2800 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 146 HP | 201 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4915 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1872 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1453 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2911 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 75 L |
