1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III vs. 2012 Audi A6
To start off, 2012 Audi A6 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi A6 (242 HP) has 96 more horse power than 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. (146 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III.
Because 2012 Audi A6 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III | 2012 Audi A6 | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Audi |
Model | 3000 Mk III | A6 |
Year Released | 1965 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 146 HP | 242 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4915 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1872 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1453 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2911 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 75 L |