1965 Austin-Healey Sprite vs. 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace
To start off, 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace would be higher. At 1,220 cc (4 cylinders), 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite weights approximately 294 kg more than 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite | 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Simca |
| Model | Sprite | Type 11 Monoplace |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1949 |
| Engine Size | 1098 cc | 1220 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 72 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 714 kg | 420 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 3130 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2250 mm |
