1965 Austin-Healey Sprite vs. 1962 Mini MK I
To start off, 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Mini MK I. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Mini MK I would be higher. At 1,098 cc (4 cylinders), 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite weights approximately 99 kg more than 1962 Mini MK I.
Because 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 Mini MK I, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite | 1962 Mini MK I | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Mini |
| Model | Sprite | MK I |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1098 cc | 848 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 34 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 714 kg | 615 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 3060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1420 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2040 mm |
