1965 Austin-Healey Sprite vs. 1966 Ford Taunus
To start off, 1966 Ford Taunus is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher. At 1,183 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Ford Taunus is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Ford Taunus weights approximately 131 kg more than 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Austin-Healey Sprite | 1966 Ford Taunus | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Ford |
Model | Sprite | Taunus |
Year Released | 1965 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 1183 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 38 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 714 kg | 845 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 4250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2530 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 45 L |