1965 Austin-Healey Sprite vs. 1969 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1969 Mazda Cosmo is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher. At 1,962 cc, 1969 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 226 kg more than 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Austin-Healey Sprite | 1969 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Mazda |
Model | Sprite | Cosmo |
Year Released | 1965 | 1969 |
Body Type | Roadster | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 1962 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 93 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 714 kg | 940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1170 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2210 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 57 L |