1965 Austin-Healey Sprite vs. 1971 NSU Ro 80
To start off, 1971 NSU Ro 80 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher. At 1,990 cc, 1971 NSU Ro 80 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1971 NSU Ro 80 weights approximately 496 kg more than 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite.
Because 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1971 NSU Ro 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Austin-Healey Sprite | 1971 NSU Ro 80 | |
Make | Austin-Healey | NSU |
Model | Sprite | Ro 80 |
Year Released | 1965 | 1971 |
Body Type | Roadster | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 1990 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 115 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 714 kg | 1210 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2870 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 82 L |