1965 Austin-Healey Sprite vs. 1972 Zastava 1300
To start off, 1972 Zastava 1300 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher. At 1,295 cc (4 cylinders), 1972 Zastava 1300 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Zastava 1300 weights approximately 266 kg more than 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Austin-Healey Sprite | 1972 Zastava 1300 | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Zastava |
Model | Sprite | 1300 |
Year Released | 1965 | 1972 |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 1295 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 53 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 714 kg | 980 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2430 mm |