1965 Austin-Healey Sprite vs. 1979 Lincoln Continental
To start off, 1979 Lincoln Continental is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher. At 6,554 cc (8 cylinders), 1979 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 1141 kg more than 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Austin-Healey Sprite | 1979 Lincoln Continental | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Lincoln |
Model | Sprite | Continental |
Year Released | 1965 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 6554 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 129 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 714 kg | 1855 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 5570 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2990 mm |