1965 Austin-Healey Sprite vs. 1980 Autobianchi A 112
To start off, 1980 Autobianchi A 112 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher. At 1,098 cc (4 cylinders), 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite weights approximately 54 kg more than 1980 Autobianchi A 112.
Because 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Autobianchi A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite | 1980 Autobianchi A 112 | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Autobianchi |
| Model | Sprite | A 112 |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1980 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1098 cc | 965 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 714 kg | 660 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 3280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2050 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 30 L |
