1965 Austin-Healey Sprite vs. 1980 Zastava 132
To start off, 1980 Zastava 132 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher. At 1,756 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Zastava 132 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Zastava 132 weights approximately 381 kg more than 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite | 1980 Zastava 132 | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Zastava |
| Model | Sprite | 132 |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1980 |
| Engine Size | 1098 cc | 1756 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 106 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 714 kg | 1095 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 4410 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2560 mm |
