1965 Austin-Healey Sprite vs. 1981 Matra-Simca Rancho
To start off, 1981 Matra-Simca Rancho is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher. At 1,442 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Matra-Simca Rancho is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Matra-Simca Rancho weights approximately 418 kg more than 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite.
Because 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Matra-Simca Rancho, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Austin-Healey Sprite | 1981 Matra-Simca Rancho | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Matra-Simca |
Model | Sprite | Rancho |
Year Released | 1965 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 1442 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 79 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 714 kg | 1132 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2530 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 60 L |