1965 Austin-Healey Sprite vs. 1982 Holden Camira
To start off, 1982 Holden Camira is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Holden Camira is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Holden Camira weights approximately 326 kg more than 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite.
Because 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Holden Camira, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Austin-Healey Sprite | 1982 Holden Camira | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Holden |
Model | Sprite | Camira |
Year Released | 1965 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 86 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 714 kg | 1040 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2580 mm |