1965 Austin-Healey Sprite vs. 1986 Renault 18
To start off, 1986 Renault 18 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher. At 1,993 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Renault 18 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Renault 18 weights approximately 421 kg more than 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite.
Because 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Renault 18, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Austin-Healey Sprite | 1986 Renault 18 | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Renault |
Model | Sprite | 18 |
Year Released | 1965 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 1993 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 104 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 714 kg | 1135 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1410 mm |