1965 Austin-Healey Sprite vs. 1988 Acura Integra
To start off, 1988 Acura Integra is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 1988 Acura Integra is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Acura Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Austin-Healey Sprite | 1988 Acura Integra | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Acura |
Model | Sprite | Integra |
Year Released | 1965 | 1988 |
Body Type | Roadster | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 125 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 4355 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1665 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2520 mm |