1965 Austin-Healey Sprite vs. 1988 Renault 19
To start off, 1988 Renault 19 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher. At 1,388 cc (4 cylinders), 1988 Renault 19 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1988 Renault 19 weights approximately 226 kg more than 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite.
Because 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Renault 19, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Austin-Healey Sprite | 1988 Renault 19 | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Renault |
Model | Sprite | 19 |
Year Released | 1965 | 1988 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 1388 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 79 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 714 kg | 940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2550 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 55 L |