1965 Austin-Healey Sprite vs. 1990 Buick Skylark
To start off, 1990 Buick Skylark is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher. At 2,259 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Buick Skylark is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Buick Skylark weights approximately 476 kg more than 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite.
Because 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Buick Skylark, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Austin-Healey Sprite | 1990 Buick Skylark | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Buick |
Model | Sprite | Skylark |
Year Released | 1965 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 2259 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 148 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 714 kg | 1190 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 4580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 62 L |