1965 Austin-Healey Sprite vs. 1990 Chrysler ES
To start off, 1990 Chrysler ES is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Chrysler ES is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Chrysler ES weights approximately 431 kg more than 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite.
Because 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Chrysler ES, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite | 1990 Chrysler ES | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Chrysler |
| Model | Sprite | ES |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1990 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1098 cc | 2213 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 93 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 714 kg | 1145 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 4370 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2470 mm |
