1965 Austin-Healey Sprite vs. 1990 Ford RS 200
To start off, 1990 Ford RS 200 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher. At 1,798 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Ford RS 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Ford RS 200 weights approximately 466 kg more than 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite.
Because 1990 Ford RS 200 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Ford RS 200 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite | 1990 Ford RS 200 | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Ford |
| Model | Sprite | RS 200 |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1990 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1098 cc | 1798 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 250 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 714 kg | 1180 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2520 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 54 L |
