1965 Austin-Healey Sprite vs. 1999 Daihatsu Micros 3l
To start off, 1999 Daihatsu Micros 3l is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher. At 1,098 cc (4 cylinders), 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite weights approximately 144 kg more than 1999 Daihatsu Micros 3l.
Because 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Daihatsu Micros 3l, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Austin-Healey Sprite | 1999 Daihatsu Micros 3l | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Daihatsu |
Model | Sprite | Micros 3l |
Year Released | 1965 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 659 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 88 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 714 kg | 570 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 2510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 1570 mm |