1965 Austin-Healey Sprite vs. 2000 Pininfarina Metrocubo
To start off, 2000 Pininfarina Metrocubo is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher. At 1,098 cc (4 cylinders), 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Pininfarina Metrocubo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Austin-Healey Sprite | 2000 Pininfarina Metrocubo | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Pininfarina |
Model | Sprite | Metrocubo |
Year Released | 1965 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 505 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | electric |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |