1965 Austin-Healey Sprite vs. 2001 Mitsubishi SUW
To start off, 2001 Mitsubishi SUW is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher. At 1,098 cc (4 cylinders), 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mitsubishi SUW weights approximately 1191 kg more than 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite.
Because 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mitsubishi SUW, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Austin-Healey Sprite | 2001 Mitsubishi SUW | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Mitsubishi |
Model | Sprite | SUW |
Year Released | 1965 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 1097 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 120 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 714 kg | 1905 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 71 L |