1965 Austin-Healey Sprite vs. 2001 Toyota Condor
To start off, 2001 Toyota Condor is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher. At 2,995 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Toyota Condor is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Toyota Condor weights approximately 745 kg more than 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite | 2001 Toyota Condor | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Toyota |
| Model | Sprite | Condor |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1098 cc | 2995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 89 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 8 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 714 kg | 1459 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 70 L |
