1965 Austin-Healey Sprite vs. 2002 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2002 Nissan Bluebird is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher. At 1,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Nissan Bluebird is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Nissan Bluebird weights approximately 456 kg more than 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite.
Because 2002 Nissan Bluebird is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Nissan Bluebird will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite | 2002 Nissan Bluebird | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Nissan |
| Model | Sprite | Bluebird |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1098 cc | 1500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 714 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1450 mm |
