1965 Austin-Healey Sprite vs. 2002 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2002 Smart ForTwo is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher. At 1,098 cc (4 cylinders), 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Smart ForTwo weights approximately 101 kg more than 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite | 2002 Smart ForTwo | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Smart |
| Model | Sprite | ForTwo |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1098 cc | 799 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 40 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 714 kg | 815 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 2510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 1820 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 22 L |
